Don't click to buy
The Legal Side of the Internet Puppy Issue
- Federally, many dog breeders are regulated by the USDA pursuant to the Animal Welfare Act. Breeders must be licensed by the USDA if they own more than three breeding females and sell dogs to brokers, research labs, or pet stores. However, the law exempts out any breeder who sells dogs directly to the public.
- When Congress enacted the Animal Welfare Act, they created an exemption for anyone deemed to be a “retail pet store” or making “direct retail sales.” The rationale behind the exemption was that consumers would be able to witness the conditions at breeding facilities if they buy a dog directly from the breeder. Congress believed that consumers would act as quasi-regulators to this sector of the market, because they would not purchase dogs from breeding facilities that appeared to be substandard.
- However, Congress did not contemplate sales of dogs via the Internet at the time of enactment of the Animal Welfare Act. As a result of the direct retail sales exemption, breeders selling dogs over the Internet are not regulated by the USDA and consumers are not seeing the breeding facilities because the dogs are typically shipped to the buyer. This loophole in the Animal Welfare Act leaves a large sector of the commercial dog breeding industry completely unregulated.
It is difficult to solve a national problem with commerce that transcends across state lines due to the different various state laws and lack of federal oversight or laws.
| Each state has had problems with Internet dog sellers |
| Alabama: Fort Payne |
| Alaska: Houston |
| Arkansas: Fayetteville |
| Florida: Deland, Keystone Heights |
| Indiana: Cloverdale, Fairbanks, |
| Louisiana: Youngsville |
| Maine: Buxton |
| Minnesota: Randall |
| Missouri: Bland |
| New Hampshire: Epping, Kingston |
| New Jersey: Somerset |
| North Carolina: Asheville, Rowland |
| Oklahoma: Waynoka |
| Oregon: Milwaukie |
| Pennsylvania: Douglassville |
| Tennessee: Blountville, Lyles |
| Texas: Ben Wheeler, Wills Point |
2008 State Animal Protection Laws
Rankings
Comparing Overall Strength & Comprehensiveness
| Best Five | California, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Oregon |
| Worst Five | Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Dakota |
| Top Tier | California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Vermont, Virgin Islands, Virginia |
| Middle Tier | Arizona, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Nevada, Oklahoma, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Utah |
| Bottom Tier | Alabama, Alaska, American Samoa, Arkansas, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Northern Mariana Islands, South Dakota, Wyoming |
2008 State Animal Protection Laws Rankings Maps
PDF, Black & White |
Download Map
PDF, Color |
Download Map
JPG, Black & White, 150 dpi |
Download Map
JPG, Color, 150dpi |
Download Map
Source:
Animal
Defense League
